Mitchell Johnson arrived in England as an Aussie champion; the leader of the attack who had taken more than twice as many Test wickets as any other Australian in the last year. In his first two Ashes Test matches Johnson has bowled so poorly that he has given pie-throwers a bad name.
Having witnessed, albeit from the Mound Stand, Michael Atherton's suicidal run out for 99 in the Lords Test of 1993 I've decided to follow the former England captain in to the world of comment. Admittedly, without his experience of facing up to Merv Hughes' bristling moustache or the more folically challenged Shane Warne or indeed having stored dust in my pocket. I hope to compensate with some mildly irreverent and probably sometimes irrelevant comments on the game of cricket.
Thursday, 30 July 2009
Storm clouds gathering
Mitchell Johnson arrived in England as an Aussie champion; the leader of the attack who had taken more than twice as many Test wickets as any other Australian in the last year. In his first two Ashes Test matches Johnson has bowled so poorly that he has given pie-throwers a bad name.
Wednesday, 22 July 2009
Champions for the Ages
Monday, 20 July 2009
Pokerface
Saturday, 18 July 2009
The Seventh Day Wonder
And on the seventh day a bowling attack arrived. We’ve had to sit through four innings and six days of this series before being rewarded for our patience with a dose of quality; a team bowling effort of concerted accuracy, sustained hostility and the exemplary execution of a plan. That it came from the England attack should not be a surprise; that the Australian batsmen succumbed in the fashion that they did, five were out playing cross batted shots, was the surprise.
As a collective unit the Australians didn’t adapt to the conditions and their total of 156/8 was the most they deserved. The ball was swinging under heavy cloud cover, the pitch carried more pace and bounce and most importantly of all England were on the money. Australia batted as if they were here to participate in a beer match. Whereas Mitchell Johnson had led the Australian attack with all the unpredictability of Andrew Flintoff steering a pedalo the totemic Lancastrian bowled with maximum hostility and customary control. Flintoff’s staggering record of only three 5 wicket hauls in his first-class career is the result not just of his back of a length bowling but of the pressure that he creates at one end to enable cheap wickets to fall at the other as batsmen relax. Once again he acted as the foil for the deserving Jimmy Anderson to rip out Hughes, Ponting, Clarke and North for a sum total of seven runs. If Anderson has been under-rated by the Australians before this series then they now know that they are dealing with a bowler who in the right conditions knows his game better than most.
Dean Jones, a brilliantly talented batsman and fielder, bridged the gap between the last time Australia were this poor (in the mid 1980s if you’re wondering) to the start of their emergence as the cricketing superpower in the early 1990s. He now spends his time passing off hyperbole as punditry and can also be found on Sky’s latest contribution to wallpaper television, ‘The Poker Ashes’. From a punditry perspective Deano’s not having the best of Ashes series; “I think (this) is the flattest batting track I have seen in ten years. Now if England are going to produce these type of pitches for the rest of the series the game will be hurt. This is not the type of pitch that we’ll be happy with. I can’t see Australia being dismissed out on this flat pitch.”
The omens don’t look good for Australia; Ricky Ponting is in grumpy gnome mode, Nathan Hauritz is recovering from a dislocated finger, Peter Siddle is struggling with a virus. Brad Haddin admitted on the first day that “The occasion at Lords got to a few of us. We probably tried a bit too hard early.” You can’t imagine Adam Gilchrist or Ian Healy admitting that – not until their biography anyway. Haddin was distracted again towards the end of play allowing himself to be preoccupied by trying to persuade the umpires to abandon play for the day – shortly after another futile conversation he was out mis-timing a pull when he should have been playing for stumps.
If the eighth day goes the way of the seventh Australia may need divine intervention but with periodic rain forecast for the remainder of the match they may just get it. It will need a more resilient and focused batting effort second time around but the baggy greens will do well to heed the lesson of Lords three years ago when Sri Lanka followed-on 359 runs behind after lunch on the third day and batted out 199 overs to draw the undrawable test. For England the message is clear too: they must clean up the tail and go for the jugular before the pitch slows up.
Friday, 17 July 2009
England: another opportunity missed
Few listened to Flower’s comments because of the storm in a tea-cup inspired by England’s naive choice of delaying tactics as the First Test came to the boil. The post-match debate raged around the ‘spirit of the game’, mystifyingly championed by Ricky Ponting who in an online poll in the Sydney based Daily Telegraph in January 2008 inspired 83% of the respondents to say that the brawler from Tasmania was not a good ambassador for the game and that 79% felt that the Australian team did not play in the ‘true spirit of the game’.
Let’s not kid ourselves here; the reality was that there were no positives to take from Cardiff for this England team. Out-bowled and out-batted England made first use of a flat track and mustered a first innings score that was soon put in to perspective by Australia against a toothless attack unable to build any pressure. Yes, it might be what passes for management speak in these days of media sound bites but for Andy Flower to talk of positives to be taken from the game was disingenuous and insulted the intelligence of the cricket supporting public. Furthermore The Ashes is not the place to learn lessons; it remains the pinnacle of cricket in both England and Australia and not the place to dot the i’s and cross the t’s in your game.
Fast forward to the first day at Lords and it’s clear that few of England’s batsmen have heeded Flower’s call to arms. Winning the toss and batting first Australia’s attack can rarely have been made to look so porous. To concede over 300 runs on the first day in successive Tests is no fluke; 364/6 coming off the back of 336/7 in Cardiff. This Australian attack is threadbare.
Reduced to two performing front line bowlers in the resilient Siddle and the impressive Hilfenhaus there were overthrows, byes, long-hops and half-volleys galore. Ricky Ponting’s gimlet eyes narrowed yet further and one wondered if he would shut them completely and cast his mind back to the days when he could throw the ball to the living legends of Warne and McGrath. Only Punter didn’t need to worry too much because he knows that this England side are incapable of learning on the job. Time and again the middle order have disintegrated and as at Cardiff there was a lack of basic technique and application required in the five day format.
Andrew Strauss must despair that after carrying his bat for a magnificent 161 his partners have again let him down. Whilst he may have been diplomatic to the press let us hope that he did not mince his words in the dressing room. Of course, you should never judge a Test match until both sides have batted but on a placid pitch against this attack it’s another opportunity missed by England to put an imposing score on the board and put Australia out of the game.