Wednesday 18 December 2013

The Return of the Urn

Australia celebrate the 150 run win in the 3rd Test at the WACA to regain the Ashes. Photograph: Jason O'Brien/Action Images
Three tests or 14 days of cricket. That was all it took for Australia to win their first series against England since 2006/07 and regain the Ashes. It was fully deserved as Australia outplayed England in all facets of the game both on and off the pitch except in the production of an 82-page cookbook.

Malaise: a vague feeling of discomfort or unease. When England recorded a seemingly comprehensive 3-0 series win in the English summer there were many that sensed a malaise within the England team. Results did not justify this feeling but performances did. With the Ashes now lost the condition of this English patient can be upgraded to chronic: usually applied when the course of the disease lasts for more than three months.

A batting line up that last passed 400 runs against New Zealand in Wellington, 23 innings ago, has displayed such a sustained drop in form that you wouldn’t back them to get the runs after a dodgy kebab on the Edgware Road. If bowlers win Test matches then they can only do so if the batsmen have put enough runs on the board to defend. For too long the England bowlers have dug the top order out of a hole either through inspired bowling despite defending low totals or by adding valuable lower order runs themselves. There is also a case to be made that their cumulative efforts have caught up with them. Broad, Swann and Anderson have bowled the most Test match overs in 2013 and now complimented by a lack of support from the batsmen, fielding errors, intelligently devised and executed plans from the Australian batsmen and a sudden inability to extract any lateral movement from the Kookaburra they too have run out of steam.

The one bright spot for England has been the arrival of Ben Stokes. A surprise choice for the tour, let alone the side, he produced a high quality century in Perth in only his fourth Test innings. Batting with technique and discipline missing from his more celebrated colleagues Stokes has recorded England’s only century. It was arguably the best innings of the series to date and it will be interesting to see if he can continue his rapid ascent. A long-term position in the side is his for the cementing.

With the urn lost, immediate attention turns to team selection for the remaining two Tests. Will Andy Flower stick by the star names who have now slumped or, with an eye on the future, re-employ Jonny Bairstow and Steven Finn or promote new blood in the shape of Gary Ballance or even Tymal Mills? The case could be made for all four but Flower’s track record suggests that he is unlikely to make wholesale changes. It is most likely that Broad’s injury will give an opportunity to Finn who should be allowed to follow the example of Jimmy Anderson and forget the recent coaching that he’s received and revert back to the wicket taking threat he used to be.

England’s recent track record of blooding new players is poor. The last unqualified success was Jonathan Trott who debuted in the last Ashes test of 2009 – early in Flower’s reign. Since then another 13 players have been handed caps. Many of these will never play Test cricket for England again (see Shahzad, Tredwell, Patel, Compton, Woakes, Morgan) and the jury is out on the remainder.

There are 14 Tests until the 2015 Ashes series in England but a 5-0 hiding is staring England in the face. For Cook, Bell, Pietersen, Anderson and Monty this would be for the second time in their career. The baggy greens of 2006/07 contained bona fide greats that would walk in to teams from any country in any era; Ponting, Gilchrist, Warne and McGrath. Of the current Australian team only Michael Clarke and potentially Mitchell Johnson would make the 2006/07 side. After Clarke’s Australia lost to England by 347 runs at Lord’s in July to go 2-0 down they were derided in their own press as the worst Australian team since that of 1978/79. Allan Border recognised the strength of Cook’s England, “Australia is up against a quality England team – there’s no questioning it. For us to win we need everyone playing to their full potential plus a little luck. At the moment, neither is happening.” In the intervening four months Australia have not suddenly become a great team. Seven of their starting lineup at Perth played at Lord’s while England fielded nine of the same XI. These are the only Tests that Australia have won all year. Australia have gone back to basics – much credit is due to Darren Lehmann – executed core skills and made themselves hard to beat. These were the same basics that had previously been hallmarks of head coach Andy Flower’s England teams. The difference is that almost all of the Australian team is now playing at their full potential compared to only one of the England team.

Thousands of England supporters are joining the tour for the final two Tests and this will be the third time in the last four away series that England have arrived in Melbourne three nil down. In 2002/03 and 2006/07 it was not a major surprise but the most loyal cricket supporters in the world expected and deserved better from this group of players. It is to be hoped that England can give them something to cheer about at the MCG and SCG but the odds do not look good. At least the exchange rate is moving in the favour of the Barmy Army.

Monday 12 August 2013

Tel Aviv Thriller


1st Test, Trent Bridge, England won by 14 runs. England 215 and 375, Australia 280 and 296

A cloudless blue sky with the sun beating down, mercury touching 35C, warm sea water and a sandy beach teeming with people modelling the latest in beach ware and apparel; welcome to Bograshov Beach, Tel Aviv. A perfect setting for a summer holiday but a less than convenient place from which to follow the action from Trent Bridge in the First Test.

Unsurprisingly The Ashes is neither front nor back page news in the Israeli press. If you asked a local for their opinion on Hot Spot they might direct you to the Clara on a Monday night and DRS sounds suspiciously like a new tax. It’s safe to say that Australia’s retreat back in to the pack from cricketing superpower will have gone unnoticed in the trendy restaurants of Neve Tzedek.

Israel’s national sport is not cricket but matkot which involves two people using carbon fibre rackets to smash a squash ball at each other as hard as possible without it touching the ground. Perversely, in an ultra-competitive society, it’s a sport which doesn’t result in a winner or loser as no points are scored but, in a lesson that no global sport has heeded apart from volleyball, it is frequently played on the beach. Whilst not threatening the status of matkot, cricket does have a presence in Israel which has grown in popularity since the departure of the British in 1948. Israel obtained ICC Associate Membership in 1974 and, with teams populated by a combination of Israelis, expatriates and migrants, has a thriving league where for Middlesex and Yorkshire read Sri Lanka Tel Aviv and Lions Lod.

Disappointingly, by the time of my holiday, cricket was not sufficiently ingrained in the public consciousness to the extent that a large screen had to be erected on the beach to keep the Israeli cricket supporters abreast of the Ashes. Instead it was a case of rationing the use of mobile phone battery so Cricinfo score updates, BBC text commentary and the occasional burst of TMS could all be accessed to keep us on the edge of our deckchairs. It’s doubtful that Aggers, Blowers, Maxwell and Boycott have held the attention of many beachgoers in Tel Aviv before. Snatches of Anderson brilliance, Bell resistance and Agar precociousness disturbed our relaxation pleasingly. The match seemed England’s to lose and lose it they so nearly did.

With the benefit of hindsight, scheduling a meeting for the climax of the Australian fightback was a foolish move. I’d expected the game to be over well before this point. When I was having lunch and receiving ball-by-ball updates from a friend in Paris it was Pattinson that joined Haddin at the crease and Australia needed 79 runs from their last wicket partnership. An Australian win looked a long shot but the target was whittled down. With my phone vibrating with score updates I kept the meeting as short as possible.

Renting a flat in Tel Aviv with an Australian could have backfired. It was about to pay dividends. Exiting the meeting I discovered to my horror that, resuming after lunch, Australia needed 20 runs to win. I was a 15 minute walk from home or, as it turned out, a 7 minute run in flip flops in 35C heat. My flatmate (did I mention he was Australian?) had the TV coverage on his tablet which was streaming several seconds behind TMS running on the laptop. With the commentary being relayed to me over the phone I ran up Ben Yehuda, turned right on to Sderot Ben Gurion. Trying not to lose my flip-flops I crossed over Dizengoff and scuttled past the fruit juice stand. Five runs came off Swann’s over. Fifteen runs or one wicket. I was in the home straight, running up Hakalir. Anderson bowling. An appeal for caught behind and a review from Cook! I ran up the two flights of stairs and put my key in the lock, opening the door to hear Haddin given out. My flatmate sat in silence. A 14 run win for England. There was little more to do other than record the moment of mixed emotions. Thanks to Tuffers for the retweet.